|
|
Don't
Fence Me In
A Review of Natalie
Goldberg's Thunder and Lightning
By Laura J.
Weinstock
Natalie Goldberg is one of
my heroes. Her book, Wild Mind, with its
practical techniques and untrammeled spiritual
fervor helped get me started as a fiction writer.
Her memoir, Long Quiet Highway, tore me open
with weeping and fits of laughter. As a fellow
Buddhist, writer and Jewish New Yorker transplanted
to the West, she resonates for me. We click. And
not just when she writes. She is equally adept at
giving vibrant lectures.
Like her other books, her
most recent, Thunder and Lightning, is well
written and uniquely honest. One of the most
pleasurable characteristics of Goldberg's work is
her stark naked candor about topics few authors
will ever broach. In Thunder, she
painstakingly describes how she pieced together her
novel and how she battled with her editors and
herself over treasured chapters she didn't want to
change. She even furnishes us with ten poorly
constructed sentences from her original manuscripts
-some of them so bad, they made me cringe.
(Followed up, in this case, by a Buddhist discourse
on attachment and letting go). This raw openness is
rare. It is a gift.
Thunder is extremely
humorous, particularly when it comes to food. In
addition to Zen and writing, Goldberg has a third
passion: eating. She describes with great ardor
numerous meals consumed with friends, her daily
intake of chocolate croissants and hot cocoa
(followed by an additional pastry if she likes what
she has written the day before), lunches with her
editors, food that her characters devour. One
night, I read out loud to my partner, Rachel,
Goldberg's detailed recollection of the food eaten
by characters in other people's books. We laughed
so hard -- our cheeks started to hurt.
How could Goldberg manage
to talk about food when discussing William Styron's
Darkness Visible: A Memoir of Madness?
Styron was so emotionally crippled at the onset of
his illness that he couldn't be happy when
receiving a prestigious award or remember to attend
the luncheon held afterward in his honor.
Ostensibly, Goldberg is describing Styron's ability
to reel in, but not frighten away his readers when
addressing the delicate subject of depression. But
Goldberg cannot resist informing us that Styron had
no appetite for the scintillating plate of seafood
placed before him. Clearly, this made the
seriousness of his suffering real to her.
In another story that made
me laugh out loud, Goldberg is able to help a
nervous student by making fun of herself. "Katagiri
would say something simple --'The present moment is
right here,' or 'When you drink a cup of tea, pay
attention to drinking a cup of tea' -- and we
strained to understand its supernatural, profound
and enlightened intent. We were so self-conscious,
so tense, so earnest that we missed everything. If
he said, 'This is a hand,' we construed it to mean
a foot, an elbow, the suffering of Bodhidharma."
Yet for all her mirth,
Thunder is more somber than vintage Natalie
Goldberg. In Writing Down the Bones and
Wild Mind, she told us to be free, creative,
boundless. Here, she teaches us to rein in the
wildness, give it form and structure. Gone are the
days when Natalie meandered in her notebooks for
thirteen years. "Now people are more efficient,"
she tells her students. The first seven pages of
Thunder are not a preface but a warning that
writing will not make us happy. Not a merry
message, particularly when contrasted with her past
exuberance. Her words still move and entertain. But
Thunder didn't grab me like her earlier work
did.
Perhaps her writing was
affected by the recent death of her father. Or
maybe it is a combination of circumstances. She
states:
Each new book I
attempt is more difficult. When I was young, the
mountain seemed far away. I had a lot of energy
to run to it and lots of new things to say. But
now I have arrived at the mountain and my body's
pressed against it. I've said everything I know;
I have to go to the unknown to speak. With no
space between me and the mountain I have to move
this mammoth escarpment each time - even one
centimeter - to produce a book. The mountain's
heavy, huge; my body's tired, getting older. All
this I didn't know in my early, loving flush
with writing.
Here, Natalie and I
diverge. Though not under any illusions that all of
life's problems vanish with the discovery of one's
creative passion, I am not in sync with her
weariness and sober message. I still feel joyful to
be writing.
Two minor criticisms: a
chapter in Part One, "But Who Is Listening," didn't
belong there; the middle section of the book where
she discusses other literature and what to glean
from it was too long. I have one major criticism.
In sharp contrast to her uncontainable openness
about everything else, Natalie is very timid in
declaring her love for women. It is as if she is
dabbing one tiny toe into the current, to see what
consequences lie below. On page 147, Natalie tells
a friend that she greatly admires the author,
Colette, because she had both male and female
lovers. Not till page 162, does Natalie reveal what
the careful reader has already surmised - that
Natalie herself likes "men and women with equal
fervor."
Why is it so important that
Ms. Goldberg come out? There are almost no lesbian
or bisexual women authors published in the
mainstream who are out in their books. Rachel and I
could only think of three: Adrienne Rich (a famous
poet years before she came out), Rita Mae Brown (an
anomaly as a successful lesbian fiction writer, out
from the start), and Nicola Griffith (a writer of
science fiction and mystery, not the most highly
regarded genres of writing). Someone as famous as
Natalie Goldberg, who writes well-esteemed works of
non-fiction and fiction, makes a huge difference by
coming out. May she become as brazen in this
department as she is in all the others. May this
help her regain joy and freedom in her life and
art.
Order
Thunder and Lightning from Powell's Independent
Bookstore!
|