//August 2, 2000
////First Harvest
//// Festival of Lammas

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BACK ISSUES

HOMEPAGE

Join Awakened Woman's Circle.
Subscribe to our free newsletter!
 

 

Wall painting of vultures, pictured in Language of the Goddess by Marija Gimbutas

  

Crescent horns of the bull
from Civilization of the Goddess, by Marija Gimbutas

 

The Grain Bin Goddess (figurine)//

In the Land of the Mothers, continued

 

 

 

Let us take a brief look at the evidence for Goddess worship at Catal. At the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, wall paintings depict scenes of vultures and vulture priestesses (drawn with human legs). Some scenes portray the excarnation of a headless corpse by vultures whose bodies contain a butterfly drawn within an egg, common symbols of rebirth. In other scenes, the vultures flank the head of the deceased in a protective stance very like that of Mut, the Egyptian Vulture Goddess as she appears on the tomb of Ankh-s-ka-re, c.2000 BCE (Getty), 4000 years after the settlement of Catalhoyuk. The Vulture is one of the oldest mythologies of death and resurrection. As a vulture, the Goddess takes the dead into her body in order to rebirth the soul &endash; in the form of an egg. At Catalhoyuk, we have our first evidence of the Goddess as vulture, and she functions in the three aspects of the Paleolithic Goddess &endash; she gives birth, she protects, and she resurrects.

The butterfly or labrys image appears in the 2nd and 3rd millennia BCE in Crete, and in historic times, the writings of Ovid, Virgil and Porphyry reveal that butterflies and bees were thought to be the souls of humans born from a bull (Gimbutas). This brings us to the most dramatic features of the dwellings at Catal &endash; the bucrania. Plastered with lime over clay and painted in red with designs of handprints, honeycomb or net patterns, and combs like vulture wings, the horned cow skulls hang from the walls in groups of three, or stand in rows in the center of a room. The horned imagery can be traced from the Paleolithic; a rock painting from Africa shows the Goddess or a Priestess wearing a horned headdress with what has been interpreted as either a field of grain or rain held between the horns. Either interpretation indicates the connection between horns and the creation-preservation-regeneration concerns of the Paleolithic Goddess imagery.

Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the existence of the Goddess are the paintings and figurines in human form, especially the figurine commented on by Hodder in a series of dialogues he and I have held via e-mail. She sits naked, Her body full to overflowing, showing Her ability to nurture. Her hands rest on the necks of the leopards that stand beside her, their tails curling back over her shoulders, showing Her connection to the wild, and Her strength and power to protect. A human figure lies between Her legs, showing Her power to reproduce. Found in a grain bin, She protected the life-giving grain, and insured the continuing cycles of life upon which the fertility of the land depended.

Although Hodder believes that "we have no suggestion that grain bins were symbolically important," the spiritual significance of grain is evident in almost every culture - from the Native American Selu, the Corn Mother, to Demeter, the Grain Mother, and all the myths and celebrations into historical times of the harvesting of the grain. A terra cotta relief from the 5th century BCE inscribed "Demeter, Lady of the Wild Things," shows Her with wheat and poppy pods, symbols of the Earth and the underworld &endash; life and death. Here is evidence that six thousand years after Catal, the people of Greece paid homage to the grain mother, and still recalled her ancient connection to the "wild things."

The theme of the protecting felines can be seen in many sculptures and reliefs throughout the Mediterrean area. There are reliefs of the Sumerian Ishtar standing on a lion very much like a relief from Anatolia of Kybele standing on a lion. But the most compelling evidence of all is the 4th Century BCE statues of Kybele that show her seated and flanked by two lionesses. The resemblance between these historic era statues of Goddess Kybele and the Neolithic Goddess from Catal is overwhelming.

Then in the first century CE, larger than life-size statues of Artemis greeted Paul when he came to Ephesus to preach against the Goddess religion. The Goddess had grown much larger and She was clothed, but Her lions were still with Her &endash; though now there were four, and they were males. With the inscriptions and historic references to both Kybele and Artemis as Goddess, how can the near-identical imagery of the Catal figure fail to identify Her as Goddess?

If the "thousands of inscriptions … and other archaeological finds" are "scant evidence" for Goddess worship at Catalhoyuk, which Goddess culture will be denied next? I believe there is a backlash operating here. Many women have been positively affected by the evidence of the feminine deity, a deity that we have not invented, but have reclaimed from a past that goes back to the beginnings of humanity. If archaeologists become entrenched in the denial of Goddess worship in past cultures, we Goddess followers become even more marginalized than we are today, and fewer and fewer women may have the opportunity to discover the Goddess in their lives. The study of Goddess cultures affects every aspect of our lives &endash; from the personal/political to the social/ecological &endash; and archaeology is an important foundation for our study. We must find ways to challenge the backlash and keep the doors open for feminist research, as we continue our work of re-discovering Goddess and re-creating Her values in our world.

 

[This article will also be published in slightly different form in an upcoming issue of Goddessing Regenerated. Sample copies are available for $5 from: Goddessing, P.O. Box 269, Valrico, FL 33595 USA.]

 

*Before the Present

**This exhibit was mounted in the museum at Catal in the fall of 1998.

References:

The Anatolian Civilizations Museum, guidebook complied by Director I. Tlemizsoy. 1998. (9)

Ephesus, museum guidebook text by Selahattin Erdemgil, Archaeologist, Director of Ephesus Museum. 1986. (6)

Awakened Woman E-Magazine, http://www.awakenedwoman.com/rose_frances.htm, 'Behold: The Art of Rose Wognum Frances' by Stephanie Hiller.

Gimbutas, Marija. The Language of the Goddess. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989. (xix )

Conkey, Margaret W. and Ruth E. Tringham, 1995, 'Archaeology and the Goddess: Exploring the Contours of Feminist Archaeology' in Stanton, Domna C. and Abigail J. Stewart (eds), 1995, Feminisms in the Academy, University of Michigan Press.

Catalhoyuk Archaeological Site, http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html, "A dialogue with the Goddess community: A discussion between Ian Hodder and Anita Louise"

Getty, Adele. Goddess, Mother of Living Nature. London: Thames and Hudson, 1990. (80)

Gimbutas _____ (270)

A photo-journal of Anita Louise's visit to Catalhoyuk in '98 is at: http://www.wordweb.org/sacredjo/catal/index.html

 Art and "wonderings" about the symbolism at Catal is at http://www.wordweb.org/sacredjo/catalart/why.html 

To check out Ian Hodder's website, go to http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html