August 19, 2001

Home

Back Issues

 

 

 

Ups and downs in Child Care dollars

Subscribe to our free e-newsletter!

 

Excerpted from: Child Care Advocacy Newsletter
Distributed online by the Children's Defense Fund

July 16, 2001

So far, in 2001 states have made some progress on early care and education, but the overall picture is not bright.

Due to lower-than-expected revenues, many states face a widening gap between revenues and expenditures and few so far are choosing to include increases in funding for child care, Head Start, and after-school care. The biennial "Fiscal Survey of States" sponsored by the National Association of State Budget Officers reported that states have had to make downward adjustments to their FY 2001 revenue estimates and FY 2002 forecasts.

Some highlights

  • Connecticut passed an initiative to increase compensation paid to child care providers for educational opportunities, including incentives for educational advancement and support for the establishment and implementation of an apprecticeship program for child care providers. However, no new funding was allocated for this initiative.
  • While Illinois' budget decreased funding for child care overall, the budget does include a small increase in funding for the state's training and compensation program, Great START (Strategy to Attract and Retain Teachers), by $2 million in FY 2002, bringing total funding to $5 million. Great START rewards child care professionals by supplementing their income based on education they have already attained above licensing standards.
  • Ohio's budget includes a dramatic shift of federal TANF funds to some programs previously funded with state money. TANF will now largely fund the state-funded Head Start program. Fewer Head Start children will be served, but children currently eligible for child care assistance that are enrolled in a child care/Head Start partnership program will be eligible for Head Start if their family's income is below 185 percent of the federal poverty level. However, the earmarking of TANF for a variety of other programs could hamper the ability of the state to meet overall child care needs in the budget's second year.
  • Oregon's budget includes an expansion of the Employer Dependent Care Tax Credit to provide employers with $.50 in tax credits for every $1 they spend in child care services for their employees. To claim this credit, an employer may provide cash assistance to their employees, offer resource and referral services, or develop an on-site child care center. The hope is that this will motivate businesses who are not currently using the Employer Dependent Care Tax Credit to invest in quality, affordable child care for their employees.
  • Pennsylvania's budget includes $2 million (using TANF surplus funds) for the Head Start Collaboration Project to build full- day/full-year child care capacity, $15 million for local after-school and summer programs, $4 million for a voluntary parent-child home visiting program with an early literacy focus, $10 million in challenge grants for child care facilities for equipment and materials, and $250,000 to train child care professionals in using I Am Your Child's early childhood development and parent education curriculum.
  • South Dakota passed legislation that provides $1 million for before- and after-school programs. Vermont's Kids Are Priority One campaign won a 10 percent increase for the state's child care subsidy program and $150,000 for school-age care in the state budget.

 

New Bill in Congress to Grant Incentives

On June 7th, Senator Reed (D-RI) introduced the Child Care Quality Incentive Act of 2001 (S. 1000) which would amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant by establishing a program of incentive grants to states to improve the quality of, and access to, child care by increasing child care payment rates. The bill would set the maximum federal share of activity costs at 75 percent.

The bill would authorize the Department of Health and Human Services to make an annual payment to an eligible state if it was determined that: 1) the state had made progress, through the assisted activities, in maintaining increased payment rates and 2) the state conducts an initial child care market rate survey at least once every two years. The bill would require a state that receives a grant to use the funds to increase significantly (up to the 100th percentile of the market rate survey) the reimbursement rate to providers for subsidized child care.

 

Find out more: http://www.childrensdefense.org/